The Finished Product
Well here it is! There is my QRG. I made it all on my own. It's little and broken. But still good. Yeah, still good (props if you know where this quote was adapted from)(:
 |
| Altmann, Gerd. "Computer Virus Binary Code Smith Binary" 10/7/2014 via pixabay. Public Domain |
So this draft might have some issues but for the most part, it is there. When reading this make sure to take note on who Ralph Langner is and why the U.S. had motives to launch such an attack. It might be a bit too technical, but then again, you guys are probably real tech savvy. So I guess you really wont have too much of an issue with it.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI really liked how your QRG was set up. It had a plenty of white space and pictures to break up the paragraphs. I think your piece could use a little more emphasis on the stakeholders and things that were going on in the world during the time of the Stuxnet. You did a very good job at explaining the back story going back to 2005. Aside from small grammatical errors and citations I think is a very good piece. Also, I love the Lilo and Stitch reference! I can't seem to hyperlink in comments so here's my rubric for you: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Nk8CdqEPS_IzKX5N2IqI3qQ05FD_7kgIeqCw2A6spCg/edit
ReplyDeleteHey Rigo, cool QRG! Here's my review, hope it helps somehow!
ReplyDeletehttps://docs.google.com/a/email.arizona.edu/document/d/1bRRtunqx2wswDSfKx32wG0FXCTUL0r6DueRD4X0hrAk/edit?usp=sharing
Hey Rigo! Here's my review of your QRG https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pcZ_q_gnM2WHarnMpnnBUxGcEe2fI5U29TJvJ6M1w6c/edit
ReplyDeleteHey Rigo! Here's my review of your QRG https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pcZ_q_gnM2WHarnMpnnBUxGcEe2fI5U29TJvJ6M1w6c/edit
ReplyDelete