Friday, May 6, 2016

Open Post to Peer Reviewer

You should check out this article on time, its pretty interesting. Why am I bringing up time? Because I seemed to have lost it. Where did is all go?

Audience Question: What are you anticipating the post-production process to be like, based on what you accomplished during the production phase?

The post production process should just be all finishing touches. In the production phase I finished the essay so all that I should have to do now is cite the sources I used, fix the grammatical mistakes, and possibly swap out any words that I have over used.

Key Information
Once I add in the citations and fix the grammatical mistakes, it should be good to turn in. However, I think you should keep a good eye on the conclusion because I think it might be a bit weak. (I should adjust it)

Major Weakness
I think that my major weakness is that I wanted to cram way to much information into this essay. I felt like I may have cut a few corners to make sure that I do not jump around to much or make this to shallow with all the stuff I wanted to write.

Major Strength
I think that my major strengths are the introductions and my transitions. I think that my intro has a good attention grabber and sets the tone for the rest of the essay. I also believe that all of my paragraphs flow into one another.

ROUGH CUT (Last one!!)

2 comments:

  1. Hey Rigo,

    I really enjoyed your paper. I loved the way that you presented the enigma of time as the backbone of your essay. However, it becomes confusing at some points in your essay. I like the idea you have, so I would suggest going through your essay and reading it out loud to yourself or a friend. This is a good way to make sure that everything make perfect sense. Other than that, you have a great paper.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey, Rigo! I made a content suggestion for you during this review process. Good job, I followed it well and enjoyed the flow of the essay but at some points, it did seem confusing. Again, great job!
    http://rashaanmalik.blogspot.com/2016/05/peer-review-15.html

    ReplyDelete